Worthen educational programs and other publicly funded programs have continued to increase in size and expense. Benefits of goal free evaluation goal free evaluation benefits are based on. Michigan curriculum framework serves as the basis for curriculum. The effectiveness of goalfree evaluation in curriculum. One of the earliest curriculum evaluation models, which continues to influence many. In this study, the goalfree evaluation technique scriven, 1972. Summative evaluation it is carried out after offering the curriculum once or twice. Tylers objective model, stakes responsive model, scrivens goal. Goalfree evaluation seeks to clarify students real experience what actually happened to them, but does not focus on what faculty planned to happen. Curriculum evaluation circe at the university of illinois. Key points goalfree evaluation gfe, in program evaluation, is a model in which the official or stated program goals and objectives are withheld or screened from the evaluator. These goals and objectives aim to standardize learning objectives for all students. Goalfree evaluation zgf evaluator avoids learning the stated purposegoalsintended achievements, of the program prior to or during the evaluation.
Critical elements of goal free evaluation goal free evaluation demands that the evaluator have good knowledge of the subject of evaluation. Character education is also defined as a certain curriculum that develops students understanding of the. Goalfree evaluation and goalbased evaluation goalfree. Major characteristics of goal free evaluation evaluator actively. Curriculum evaluation should be concerned with assessing the value of a program of study and a course of study a field of study 3.
To prevent this from occurring a permanent follow up of. Key points goal free evaluation gfe, in program evaluation, is a model in which the official or stated program goals and objectives are withheld or screened from the evaluator. What you lose with these models seems to be a more holistic approach in curriculum evaluation dealing with more factors, in the goal free approach. Curriculum development should have two major outcomes. Goalfree evaluation often shortened to gfe is any evaluation in which the evaluator conducts the evaluation without particular knowledge of or reference to. A curriculum that operates satisfactorily over a period time may become obsolete. What you lose with these models seems to be a more holistic approach in curriculum evaluation dealing with more factors, in the goalfree approach. Curriculum development using effective goals and objectives. Definition of goalbased evaluation gbe and goalfree evaluation. Goalfree evaluation gfe is any evaluation in which the. This approach focuses on the actual outcomes rather than the intended outcomes of a program.
Goal free evaluation is done by a separate evaluator, who collects exploratory data to supplement another evaluators goaloriented data. Such an evaluation will summarise the merits and demerits of the programme. Students should acquire the same knowledge from the same courses, regardless of teacher and students should finish a course ready to move on to the next course, year, or life stage. Pdf the role of evaluation in curriculum design find, read and cite all the research you need on researchgate. Many of the goalbased evaluation models seem to be more systematic, with clearer steps for evaluating curriculum. The drawback, in my opinion, to these approaches, is less clarity for implementation. Thus, the evaluator has minimal contact with the program managers and staff and is unaware of the programs stated goals and objectives. Its a type of evaluation model in which we wont set any goal. Reference edusitesdefaultfilesattachmentsu58201 4cafeyoukerfall051. Models of curriculum evaluation discipline of music. A curriculum evaluation may qualify as a program ducting civilservice examinations, and con 42. Goalgoalfree evaluation goalfree evaluation and goaland.
Goalfree evaluation gfe is an evaluation model in which the evaluator is deliberately kept from the stated or implied goals and objectives of the program. By reducing interaction with program staff, it is less susceptible to social, perceptual, and cognitive biases. A field study of goalbased and goalfree evaluation techniques. Worthen and sanders 1987 define curriculum evaluation as the formal determination of the quality, effectiveness, or value of a programme, product, project, process, objective, or. Stakes responsive model, and eisners connoisseurship model presented below give some support to bradleys effectiveness model.
1514 1242 83 1074 345 1165 819 626 1102 470 1242 971 1213 214 949 1584 830 268 190 1144 452 1385 241 878 956 1179 83 1542 90 128 1117 407 323 416 5 82 958 811 330 1029 1231 1124 560